The symposium proposed that ‘contemporary illustrators revisit mythic and folkloric sources to reimagine how older narrative worlds can speak to present concerns like ecological precarity, minority rights, and diasporic identity’.
Could you introduce some successful examples from the symposium – or contemporary illustration practitioners in South Asia more broadly?
When we think about folklore, the initial response may be to look into the vernacular of the past. However, contemporary folklore – within the digital realm, for example – may take shapes that would not be readily associated with this conventional reading of ‘folklore’. How do you think contemporary illustrators embrace that?
Cultural theorist Svetlana Boym distinguishes between ‘restorative nostalgia’, which solidifies the past in a romanticised idea of ‘tradition’, and ‘reflective nostalgia’, which critically examines the ideas about the past, often approaching it with both longing and irony. Do you think these categories are in some way applicable to the works you’ve seen or discussed in the symposium?
The symposium outline mentions influences of ‘imported aesthetic and ideological frameworks like that of Gulf-influenced Islamization and the soft power of East Asian visual culture’ that affect contemporary illustration in South East Asia.
On top of these, there are pressures coming from confronting the Western European gaze: Mariam Tafsiri, for example, addressed the problem of self-orientalisation in her presentation. What research strategies and theoretical frameworks do you think illustrators may use to navigate these pressures and not collapse under their weight?
What were the ideas expressed during the symposium that were the most insightful for you personally as an illustrator and academic?